Legal Opinion

Donovan v. Oakland & Berkely Rapid Transit Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1894No. 15373PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

Action to recover damages for a personal injury alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant—a private corporation. The cause coming on to be tried by a jury, at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence in chief, the defendant moved for judgment of nonsuit, which was granted; and plaintiff appeals .from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial.

That the evidence was sufficient to prove that defendant fell into an open hole in Grove street in Oakland township, in the night-time, and thereby suffered the injury complained of (fracture…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boswell v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Darmstaetter v. MoynahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Du Pratt v. LickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Williams v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Andrews v. RunyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ulmen v. SchwiegerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Ruehl v. Lidgerwood Rural Telephone Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Frassi v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Cotter v. LindgrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. T. J. Mansfield Const. Co. v. GorslineTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API