Donovan v. Oakland & Berkely Rapid Transit Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to recover damages for a personal injury alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant—a private corporation. The cause coming on to be tried by a jury, at the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence in chief, the defendant moved for judgment of nonsuit, which was granted; and plaintiff appeals .from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial.
That the evidence was sufficient to prove that defendant fell into an open hole in Grove street in Oakland township, in the night-time, and thereby suffered the injury complained of (fracture…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boswell v. LairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Darmstaetter v. MoynahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Du Pratt v. LickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Williams v. Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Andrews v. RunyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ulmen v. SchwiegerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Ruehl v. Lidgerwood Rural Telephone Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Frassi v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Cotter v. LindgrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- T. J. Mansfield Const. Co. v. GorslineTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.