Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Runyon

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1884No. 9,203PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The defendants solicited and received subscriptions from-various interested parties to repair a break in a levee on the Sacramento Biver. The moneys obtained were placed in the hands of defendant Bunyon, and he made a verbal contract with Ah Long, a Chinaman, to rebuild the levee.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The defendants solicited and received subscriptions from-various interested parties to repair a break in a levee on the Sacramento Biver. The moneys obtained were placed in the hands of defendant Bunyon, and he made a verbal contract with Ah Long, a Chinaman, to rebuild the levee. The Chinese contractor, in rebuilding the levee, dug up a portion of the public road, leaving an excavation from three to five feet in depth, and about ten feet in width, extending across the traveled way.…

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This action was instituted to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of defendants, and comes before this court on appeal of the parties last named from the judgment and order denying a new trial.

Many points are argued in the briefs of counsel, which we are called on to consider and determine.

As to the objections to the complaint, we are of opinion that they are not well taken.

It is urged that the plaintiff was a married woman wdio had deserted her husband, and therefore was not competent to sue alone. The court in its direction to the jury…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fernandes v. Sacramento City Ry.California Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taha v. FinegoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Miles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Humphrey v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Vázquez v. Porto Rico Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1926
  5. Baldwin v. Second Street Cable RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API