Legal Opinion

State v. Mills

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1952No. 7682PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Leo Mills was convicted by a jury of the crime of carnal knowledge. On this appeal he claims that the jury disregarded the court’s instructions and that the verdict was based on passion and prejudice. These two contentions are but corollaries of one problem: Was the evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict?

The facts, in summary, are:

The victim of the offense is a 17 year old girl; she lives with her parents; had worked as a nursemaid in a Salt Lake City home for about two and a half months during which time the defendant was also employed there as a chauffeur. This was the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. State v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. State v. BayesUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State v. MontgomeryUtah Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. State v. MillsUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. AllgoodUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. StettinaUtah Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API