Legal Opinion
Avrahami v. Clark
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 8, 2020No. 2:19-cv-04631Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Benyamin Avrahami, et al., ) N o. CV-19-04631-PHX-SPL 9 ) ) 10 Plaintiffs, ) AMENDED ORDER1 ) 11 vs. ) ) 12 Celia Clark, et al., ) ) 13 ) Defendants. ) 14 ) ) 15 16 Before the Court are several motions to dismiss filed by Defendants.2 For the 17 following reasons, the Complaint (Doc. 1) shall be dismissed without prejudice and 18 Plaintiffs3 shall have leave to file an amended complaint. 19 I. Background 20 This case arises from Plaintiffs and Defendants creating and operating a 21 22 1 This Order amends page…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.