Haynes v. Waite
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Twelfth District. Judgment for plaintiff upon the report of a referee finding, that there was no application of payments by defendants. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.
In 1857, the defendants executed to the plaintiff their two promissory notes—one bearing date in July, for five thousand two hundred dollars, payable in six months, and drawing interest at two per cent, a month; and the other bearing date in September, for two thousand five hundred dollars, payable in thirty days, and drawing interest at two and a half per cent, a month. In 1858, several sums were paid on account of the notes, without any designation by the defendants of the particular note upon which the payments were to be applied; and the question for decision is one of appropriation. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- The Mayor and Commonalty of Alexandria v. Patten and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Robinson v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1840
- Harker v. ConradSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1825
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Woolen Co. v. MaagetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Smith v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Dunklin County v. BlakemoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Joy v. RousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Christnot v. Montana Gold & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.