Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dunklin County v. Blakemore

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 16, 1918PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Dunklin Circuit Court. — Hon. Frank Kelly, Judge. (1) The court erred in overruling appellants’ sepa-, rate motion for new trial and appellants’ separate motion in arrest of judgment, after sustaining separate motion for new trial and separate motion in arrest of judgment of appellant’s co-defendants, Langdon Jones and Byron Jones, as there can only he one final judgment in a cause disposing, of all parties. Sec. 2979, R. S. 1999; Crow v. Crow, 124 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Dunklin Circuit Court. — Hon. Frank Kelly, Judge. (1) The court erred in overruling appellants’ sepa-, rate motion for new trial and appellants’ separate motion in arrest of judgment, after sustaining separate motion for new trial and separate motion in arrest of judgment of appellant’s co-defendants, Langdon Jones and Byron Jones, as there can only he one final judgment in a cause disposing, of all parties. Sec. 2979, R. S. 1999; Crow v. Crow, 124 Mo. App. 125; Miller, v. Bryden, 34 Mo. App. 698-; Eicbelmann v. Weiss, 7 Mo. App. 89; Holborn v. Naughton, 69 Mo. App. 195; Bremen…

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a suit against the treasurer of Dunklin County and. the sureties on his bond. The treasurer’s books show a shortage of more than $14,000. Over $6000 of this occurred during his first term. He was re-elected in 1906, and went out of office January 29, 1909. The verdict was for the shortage during his second term and. interest from the date he went out of office. Three defendants were sued as the heirs.of a deceased surety. One of these was not served. The other two proved their ancestor died before suit wás brought and that his estate had been finally…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henry County v. SalmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Aull v. St. Louis Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Sweet v. OwensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Hayes v. ManningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Cornelius v. CorneliusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Neal v. Curtis & Co. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Electrolytic Chlorine Co. v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  3. Rockenstein v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. Smith v. ThomasIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State Ex Rel. Sullivan County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API