Legal Opinion

Hill v. LaGrand Industrial Supply Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2004No. 9905-05676; A111301PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for product liability and negligence (and other claims not relevant on appeal) based on his exposure to asbestos-containing products distributed and sold by defendant. The jury returned a special verdict, finding that defendant’s product was defective; that it was not a substantial factor in causing plaintiffs injury; and that defendant was not negligent. Plaintiff moved for a new trial based on several instances of what he characterized as juror misconduct. The trial court denied his motion, and he appeals. We affirm.

Plaintiffs allegations of juror misconduct…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Faverty v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Carson v. BrauerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Ertsgaard v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Of Washington, V. Robert Jesse HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API