Legal Opinion

Quintana v. Baca

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 18, 2005No. CV 05-05414DDP(SHX)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

PREGERSON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs motion to strike affirmative defenses from the defendant’s answer.

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiff, Martin Quintana, is a member of the discrete class of persons whose defining characteristic is that they resided on the floor while in the custody of the Los Angeles County Men’s Central Jail (“the Jail”) because there was insufficient seating available. The plaintiff asserts that this insufficient seating violated his constitutional rights.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
  3. In Re 2TheMart. Com, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. SandsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
  5. Wailua Associates v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Elizondo v. Hood Machine, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Rosen v. Masterpiece Marketing Group, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. Hernandez v. County of MontereyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
  4. Vogel v. Huntington Oaks Delaware Partners, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
  5. Dealertrack, Inc. v. HuberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API