Legal Opinion
Broadway v. Wester
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 11, 1967No. 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
The plaintiff brothers were each shot by the defendant Wester. They (“Earl” and *856“Everrette”) bring this suit for personal injuries thus sustained. The trial court awarded them judgment.
By his appeal to this court the defendant Wester contends that no recovery should be allowed because the Broadway brothers, the plaintiffs, were the aggressors who provoked the fight, Massett v. Keff, 116 La. 1107, 41 So. 330, Oubre v. Judice, La.App. 3 Cir., 147 So.2d 745, Ponthieu v. Coco, La.App. 2 Cir., 18 So.2d 351, and because he, Wester, acted in justified self-defense, Lamartiniere v.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gaspard v. LeMaireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Ballard v. National Indemnity Company of Omaha, Neb.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
- Oakes v. H. Weil Baking Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Massett v. KeffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Rivers v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Karisny v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- McDaniel v. CormierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Broadway v. WesterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Harmer v. Commercial Standard InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969