Oakes v. H. Weil Baking Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.
Alleging that while in the establishment of the H. Weil Baking Company he was assaulted and slandered by Carl Goldenberg, president and general manager, plaintiff prosecutes the present suit against the company and said Goldenberg in solido for damages in the sum of $7,000 for personal injuries resulting from the assault and $3,000 for the slander.
For answer, defendants denied each and •every pertinent allegation in plaintiff’s petition. There was judgment against defendants for $750 damages resulting from the assault; nothing being allowed for the alleged slander. Defendants appealed, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Massett v. KeffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Bankston v. ForksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
- Miller v. MecheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Fontenelle v. WaguespackSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Vernon v. BankstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Landry v. BellangerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Tripoli v. GurrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
- Randall v. RidgleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Rivers v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- In the Matter of Nancy Deabate Dardar and Walton J. Dardar, Bankrupts. Joseph Leo Petty, Sr. v. Nancy Deabate Dardar and Walton J. DardarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.