Legal Opinion
Getzler v. Boehm
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal by plaintiffs from judgment of the Seventh Judicial District Court. .
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The action is to recover brokerage on the sale the lease and contents of the liquor store, No. 63 Nassau .street, this city.. -
In November, 1894, the place in question was run by Joseph. Kopetsky, who was anxious to dispose of it. He mentioned his purpose to David Hoexter, who called upon the plaintiffs and signed in his own name an agreement employing them- to sell the place for $10,000 cash. Kopetsky did not pay his rent, and was dispossessed, and a chattel mortgage on the stock in the store held by Beadleston & Woerz was foreclosed about December 9, 1894.
The defendant Boehm was one of-the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Lloyd v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Levy v. CooganNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
- Baker v. ThomasNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Hanford v. ShapterNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- Risser v. HirshhornCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952