Hanford v. Shapter
New York Court of Common Pleas
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the general term of the Marine Court, affirming a judgment of that court entered on a decision of a judge at trial term. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.*—Joseph F. Daly, J.
—The original employment of plaintiffs as real estate brokers by defendant, the owner of .the premises, is conceded. It is also conceded that the defendant sold the property to Eno for the price at which he had put it in the plaintiffs’ hands. The questions remaining are: 1. Did the employment of plaintiffs by defendant continue up to the time of the sale. 2. Were the efforts of the plaintiffs the procuring cause of the sale (Chilton v. Butler, 1 E. D. Smith, 150; Briggs v. Rowe, 1 Abb. Ct. App. Dec. 189, s. c. 4 Keyes, 424);
On the first point the judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Briggs v. RoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Bidwell v. WeeksNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1858
- Briggs v. RoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southwick v. SwavienskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Zuckerman v. MartinNew York City Court · 1960
- Atwater v. WilsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- Getzler v. BoehmAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
- Anderson v. SmytheColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.