Sterling Cider Co. v. Hassett
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought pursuant to Section 24 of the Judicial Code, 36 Stat. 1091, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41, Subds. (1 and 5), seeking a refund of $429.60, wine tax, paid November 14, 1940, with interest from that date. The tax was imposed under the provisions of Section 3030(a) (2),1 26 U.S.*591C.A. Int.Rev.Code, 53 Stat. 347, and computed at the rate of 2% cents on each one-half pint or fraction thereof of sparkling wine allegedly produced by appellant and subject to the tax. The case was tried before a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of the government and judgment entered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carter v. Liquid Carbonic Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Taylor v. TreatU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
- Sterling Cider Co. v. CaseyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923