Legal Opinion

Sterling Cider Co. v. Hassett

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 27, 1943No. 3794Published

1Opinion of the Court

MAHONEY, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought pursuant to Section 24 of the Judicial Code, 36 Stat. 1091, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41, Subds. (1 and 5), seeking a refund of $429.60, wine tax, paid November 14, 1940, with interest from that date. The tax was imposed under the provisions of Section 3030(a) (2),1 26 U.S.*591C.A. Int.Rev.Code, 53 Stat. 347, and computed at the rate of 2% cents on each one-half pint or fraction thereof of sparkling wine allegedly produced by appellant and subject to the tax. The case was tried before a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of the government and judgment entered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. Liquid Carbonic Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Taylor v. TreatU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  3. Sterling Cider Co. v. CaseyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API