State v. Frawley
Washington Supreme Court
1Dissent
¶54 (dissenting) — The lead opinion reverses the convictions in Frawley and Applegate for public trial violations even though Ronald Applegate affirmatively waived his right to a public trial and Brian Frawley never objected to the in-chambers questioning of one juror and, in fact, consented to it. I respectfully dissent.
Wiggins, J.
¶55 I agree with Justice Gordon McCloud that a criminal defendant may affirmatively waive his or her right to a public trial as long as the waiver meets the constitutional standard for waiver. Concurrence/dissent at 470. Thus, like Justice Gordon McCloud, I would…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.