Legal Opinion

State v. Frawley

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2014No. Nos. 80727-2; 86513-2Published

1Dissent

¶54 (dissenting) — The lead opinion reverses the convictions in Frawley and Applegate for public trial violations even though Ronald Applegate affirmatively waived his right to a public trial and Brian Frawley never objected to the in-chambers questioning of one juror and, in fact, consented to it. I respectfully dissent.

Wiggins, J.

¶55 I agree with Justice Gordon McCloud that a criminal defendant may affirmatively waive his or her right to a public trial as long as the waiver meets the constitutional standard for waiver. Concurrence/dissent at 470. Thus, like Justice Gordon McCloud, I would…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API