Legal Opinion

Paul Craig Scott v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided April 2, 2019No. 14-17-00493-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed and Plurality, Concurring, and Dissenting Opinions filed April 2, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00493-CR PAUL CRAIG SCOTT, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 11 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2095430 PLURALITY OPINION Appellant Paul Craig Scott appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated (“DWI”). He asserts that officers lacked probable cause to support a warrantless arrest and unduly prolonged his detention, making it illegal. The court affirms. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Amador v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Adrienne Deray August v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2019
  2. Carlos Omar Villanueva v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2021
  3. David Rivera v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2026
  4. Dylan James Larson v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2025
  5. Gerald Christopher Kronenthal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API