Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Amato and Creely
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 2006No. 2005 CA 0376PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
934 So.2d 779 (2006)
Howard P. ELLIOTT, Jr.
v.
AMATO AND CREELY, a Professional Law Corporation, and Madro Bandaries.
No. 2005 CA 0376.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
March 29, 2006.
Paul H. Spaht, Kantrow, Spaht, Weaver & Blitzer, Baton Rouge, for Plaintiff-Appellee Howard P. Elliott, Jr.
Anna E. Dow, Baton Rouge, Madro Bandaries, Gretna, for Defendants-Appellants Amato & Creely, APLC, and Madro Bandaries.
Before: PARRO, McDONALD, and HUGHES, JJ.
PARRO, J.
In this declaratory judgment action regarding disputed attorney fees, the defendants, Amato and Creely, A Professional Law Corporation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Cacamo v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Jordan v. Central Louisiana Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Price v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Peters v. Alpharetta Spa, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arc Industries, LLC v. NungesserLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- French Jordan, Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Jones v. LIVINGSTON PARISH LAW ENFOR. DIST.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Novelaire Technologies, LLC v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Concursus Proceeding in Breach of Contract & Inequitable Attorneys Fee-Split Levert v. MartinezLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.