Legal Opinion

Hynes v. Donaldson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 14, 1964No. 20512PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frantz.

The propriety of a summary judgment in favor of Republic Carloading and Distributing Co., Inc., designated hereinafter as the Corporation, is disputed by writ of error in this Court.

Hynes and Boettger sued Donaldson and the Corporation for damages alleged to have been sustained in an automobile collision in which Donaldson was charged with negligence and liability was asserted against the Corporation on the theory of respondeat superior.

The Corporation filed an answer in which it denied that Donaldson was its agent and servant at the time of the collision. By its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ryan v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Gibson v. DupreeColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Cooley v. EskridgeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Keller v. Koca ex rel. AlparSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Aaron Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering IncArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Russell v. First Am. Mtg. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Fowler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Lytle v. KiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API