Legal Opinion

State v. Steinhaus

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1987No. C1-86-2062PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant disputes whether his offense involved sufficiently aggravating circumstances to justify a greater than double departure from the presumptive sentence.

FACTS

On April 23, 1986, appellant Timothy Steinhaus was home with his five week old son. In an attempt to stop the baby’s crying, Steinhaus struck the infant approximately five times with his open hand. The blows were severe enough to cause the infant’s eyes to turn black and blue almost immediately. Steinhaus made no attempt to explain the true cause of the bruises to his wife or seek medical attention…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. StummSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. MortlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. PartlowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. MesichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API