Legal Opinion
State v. Pearson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 31, 1991No. C9-91-1157PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant Donald Byron Pearson challenges the trial court’s imposition of a du-rational and dispositional departure. We affirm.
FACTS
In August of 1988, Pearson was living with his fiancee, Patricia Williams. The complaint indicates that in the early morning hours of August 14,1988, Pearson took the couple’s seven-week-old daughter and went into a bedroom.
*403Later in the day Ms. Williams noticed bite marks on the child’s body and listlessness in the child’s movements. Upon admission to Minneapolis Children’s Medical Center, the child was diagnosed as having bite marks on her…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- United States v. Perry York, United States of America v. Peter Andrew RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. MisquadaceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. MisquadaceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991