Legal Opinion · Dissent

Free Speech Coalition v. Reno

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2000No. 97-16536Published

1Dissent

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge,

with whom O’SCANNLAIN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc:

I respectfully dissent from the order denying the petition for rehearing en banc. The divided panel decision warranted this Court’s en banc attention because it.creates a conflict with our sister circuits on an issue of exceptional importance.

The conflict? The panel majority struck down the provisions of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (“CPPA”) that criminalize visual depictions that “appear to be” or “convey the impression” of child pornography. See…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. Terry Burton KimbroughCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API