Legal Opinion
Stout v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 18, 1997No. Civil Action 95 CV 0193PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This case arose originally under Section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1140. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Section 502 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e) and under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. On January 12, 1995 Plaintiffs Mary Stout, Kenneth Debus, Daniel Gu-lini and Lee Hedden filed an action against Defendant Bethlehem Steel Corporation alleging unlawful interference with ERISA rights, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in their employment contracts. Defendants were…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morris v. Paul Revere Insurance GroupDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Pelosi v. Schwab Capital Markets, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Nolen v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Caldwell v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- O'Sullivan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.