In re L.M.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentMcFarland, C.J.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision holding that changes to the juvenile offender system over the last couple of decades have eroded the protective, rehabilitative features of that system to the point that it has become akin to the adult criminal system and, therefore, juvenile offenders are now constitutionally entitled to a jury trial.
In McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528, 29 L. Ed. 2d 647, 91 S. Ct. 1976 (1971), the United States Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment does not require the states to provide a jury trial in a juvenile…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. SchaafWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. GleasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. LawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.