Legal Opinion

Furness Pacific, Ltd. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1946No. Civ. No. 15152PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Sufficient facts are set forth in the petition for a writ of review to enable the court to determine the only issue involved in this proceeding without the necessity of the filing of a return by respondents.

An employee of petitioners, Furness Pacific, Ltd., was injured on June 11, 1940. He filed his application for adjustment of his claim and on April 2,1941, respondent commission entered its findings and award determining that the employee had suffered a temporary total disability. Thereafter further proceedings were had and additional orders were made by the commission which are not under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gobel v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Broadway-Locust Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Westvaco Chlorine Products Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Sutton v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sprague v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State of California v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API