Legal Opinion

Lucchesi v. Giannini & Uniack

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1984No. A017761PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, J.

Plaintiff Dennis A. Lucchesi (Lucchesi) brought an action for malicious prosecution 1 against Edwin and Virginia Ela (the Elas) and their attorneys, Thomas Uniack, David T. Giannini, and the law firm of Giannini & Uniack. (Uniack, Giannini, and their law firm will be identified collectively as attorneys.) The trial court granted separate motions for summary judgment brought by the Elas and their attorneys. 2 Plaintiff appeals.

In their motions for summary judgment, the Elas and their attorneys each argued that the trial court rulings denying defense motions for summary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Cervantez v. J. C. Penney Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. McKinney v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Sosinsky v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Hayman v. BlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Ross v. KishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API