Legal Opinion

Emblem, Inc. v. Picolo

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1960No. 21268PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YARRUT, Judge.

The only issue here is whether defendant is liable for a 25% attorney fee ($545) provided in the promissory note and chattel mortgage sued upon.

The District Judge disallowed the attorney fee, and we agree with him.

The undisputed material facts are that, to secure the purchase price of certain household furniture, defendant executed the note and chattel mortgage, payable in 90 days, bearing 8% interest, with a stipulation for a 25% attorney fee should the note be placed with an attorney for collection.

While the trial judge sustained objection to parole testimony seeking to prove…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rex Credit Co. v. KirschLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. St. Charles Dairy, Inc. v. HayesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Boulevard Investment Corp. v. BoulmayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Schaefer v. BrownLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Burris v. GayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Maurin v. Adam Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Andrus v. AndrusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Guttuso v. Jax Federal Credit UnionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Schultz v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API