Legal Opinion

Guttuso v. Jax Federal Credit Union

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1972No. 5199PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMMON, Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether attorney’s fees are due on a promissory note.

Salvador J. Guttuso, maker of the note, commenced these proceedings by filing a petition for a declaratory judgment. He alleged that Jax Federal Credit Union, the payee, after accepting the last eight monthly payments on the note after the due date without penalty or protest, referred the note to its attorney for collection on February 4, 1971 without prior notice that payment would be required on the due date. Further alleging he had made all subsequent payments timely, Guttuso sought a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Brewing Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Emblem, Inc. v. PicoloLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Maurin v. Adam Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burris v. GayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Rockwood Insurance Co. v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Philip Quaglino Tobacco Co. v. FenertyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API