Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Summers
Texas Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceJustice Willett
In times of political rancor, vengeful motives are swiftly attributed (and swiftly believed). This is unfortunate, but also unaffecting. The judiciary, rightly understood, is not a political institution but a legal one, meaning we must decide cases on the basis of principled legal points, not political talking points.
This appeal constitutes something of a legal Rorschach test: People see in it what they wish, and one person’s commendable restraint is another’s condemnable activism. Here, one side (Entergy) contends that judicial restraint requires a plain-language reading of the statute, that…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited65 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.