Legal Opinion

Entergy Gulf States, Inc. v. Summers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2009No. 05-0272Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Willett

In times of political rancor, vengeful motives are swiftly attributed (and swiftly believed). This is unfortunate, but also unaffecting. The judiciary, rightly understood, is not a political institution but a legal one, meaning we must decide cases on the basis of principled legal points, not political talking points.

This appeal constitutes something of a legal Rorschach test: People see in it what they wish, and one person’s commendable restraint is another’s condemnable activism. Here, one side (Entergy) contends that judicial restraint requires a plain-language reading of the statute, that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. City of Rockwall v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1999

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API