Legal Opinion

Ochs v. Makousky

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1996No. S-94-540PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff-appellant, Edith Ochs, conservator for the estate of Josephine Castka, a protected person, alleges that the defendant-appellee, Leonard Makousky, “unlawfully took and converted” to his own use and benefit $55,000 of Josephine Castka’s funds. Pursuant to verdict, the district court entered judgment in favor of Makousky. Ochs appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, and we, on our own motion, removed the matter to this court in order to regulate the caseloads of the two courts.

In 1967, Josephine Castka, who was born on April 16, 1901, and her sister Carrie Castka sold their farm…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barelmann v. FoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Healy v. LangdonNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Winfield v. CIGNA COMPANIESNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. ConAgra, Inc. v. Bartlett PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Melcher v. Bank of MadisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doe v. ZedekNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Zimmerman v. FirsTier Bank, N.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Traphagan v. Mid-America Traffic MarkingNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In Re Wal-Mart Wage & Hour Employment Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2007
  5. Boettcher v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API