Legal Opinion

Ziegler v. City of Junction City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1913No. 19,006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MASON, J.:

Prior to 1913 the statute relating to cities of the second class provided that the improved property should bear the cost of paving streets, except at the intersections, which were paved at the expense of the city. (Gen. Stat. 1909, § 1374; amended by Laws 1911, ch. 102, § 1.) The statute book of that year contains what purports to be an act changing this rule by requiring the city to bear also one-third of the cost of paving in front of private property. (Laws 1913, ch. Ill, § 1.) A doubt has arisen whether this act, as enrolled, approved by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Attorney General v. FrancisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. SimonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Hopkins v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. School District No. 37 v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Patrick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API