Arias v. AAA LANDSCAPING
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MINZNER, Chief Judge.
Worker appeals an order of summary, judgment entered in favor of Employer. Worker challenges the workers’ compensation judge’s (WCJ) determination that the facts of his case do not fall within any recognized exceptions to the going and coming rule. Our first and second calendar notices proposed affirmance. Worker filed timely memoranda in opposition to both calendar notices. Not being persuaded by Worker’s memoranda, we affirm.
Facts.
Employer owns a landscaping business in Albuquerque, and Worker was employed by the business. During the off-season, Employer asked…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Edens v. New Mexico Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Gallman v. Springs MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Garrison Ex Rel. Estate of Garrison v. Safeway StoresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Avila v. Pleasuretime Soda, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ramirez v. Dawson Production Partners, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Rodriguez v. PERMIAN DRILLING CORP.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011