Legal Opinion

Conant v. Rodriguez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1992No. 11851PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTZ, Judge.

Abran Rodriguez, d/b/a Abe Rodriguez and Associates, appeals a judgment entered against him for compensatory and punitive damages in a non-jury trial. Plaintiff, Georgianne Conant, alleged misconduct with respect to a polygraph examination that her employer, Katherine Katona, ordered her to take. Leo Gurule, working under the auspices of Abe Rodriguez and Associates, conducted the examination. Gurule reported to Katona that Conant failed the examination and that she untruthfully answered questions concerning an alleged theft of money from the business. Katona then fired…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Adams v. MurakamiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Gallegos v. Citizens Insurance AgencyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Newberry v. Allied Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Newberry v. Allied Stores, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Gonzales v. SansoyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Perrine v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Gonzales v. Surgidev Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rhein v. ADT Automotive, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gillingham v. Reliable ChevroletNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Coffey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API