Legal Opinion

Engwer v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 1986No. CX-85-1739PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Appellant JoDell Engwer’s driving privileges were revoked pursuant to the implied consent law. After a hearing on her petition for judicial review, the trial court sustained the revocation. This appeal followed. We affirm.

FACTS

Officer Joel Heckman, a Circle Pines police officer, was on routine patrol at approximately 2:35 a.m. He observed a vehicle moving at a slow speed, continuously braking and jerking and stopping; he saw the tail lights go on and off three or four times. He watched the car as it turned left, and on the straightaway it continuously braked. The car…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. People v. IngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Shull v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. TilleskjorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. State v. TilleskjorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API