Legal Opinion

State v. Shanahan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 18, 1978No. 78-044PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.

In this condemnation proceeding the following question of law was transferred in advance of trial by the Superior Court (Flynn, J.);

Are the condemnees entitled to compensation not only for the land taken but also for the diminution, if any, in the market value of the [untaken] property caused by any impairment of access occasioned by the installation of curbing?

We rule that the condemnees are entitled to compensation only if the impairment of their right of access is substantial.

Defendant Shanahan was the owner of a 10,000-square-foot lot situated at the intersection of South Willow Street…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Metzger v. Town of BrentwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Sibson v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  3. LaCroix v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. L. Grossman & Sons, Inc. v. Town of GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Tilton v. SharpeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Merit Oil of New Hampshire, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. Orcutt v. Town of RichmondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. Price v. City of KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API