Legal Opinion
Bostron v. Apfel
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 19, 2000No. Civ.H-97-3154PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, Senior District Judge.
This Title VII case has had a lengthy and tortuous history, culminating in a recent trial in which the jury was unable to agree upon a final verdict as to all of the issues presented to it. A mistrial was declared by the Court,' and a Partial Judgment has been entered.
As a result of numerous pretrial rulings made by the Court, only some of the many claims of plaintiffs Michael H. Bostron and Maurice R. DuBois were presented to the jury. 1 Seeking relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., these…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pathways Psychosocial v. Town of Leonardtown, MDDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Van Slyke v. Northrop Grumman Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Petit v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Wright v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2005
- Bailey v. Anne Arundel County, MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.