Briglia v. Mondrian Mortgage Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
RODRIGUEZ, A.A., J.A.D.
In this appeal, we hold that a mortgagee in possession of vacant residential property is not a commercial landowner for purposes of imposing sidewalk liability. To the extent that Colarte v. Federal Nat’l Mortgage Assn., 298 N.J.Super. 525, 689 A.2d 869 (Law Div.1996), holds to the contrary it is overruled. We therefore affirm the summary judgment entered against plaintiffs Timothy and Deborah Briglia which dismissed their complaint against Mondrian Mortgage Corporation (Mondrian) and Daniel R. Spencer (Spencer).
The parties…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stewart v. 104 Wallace Street, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Mirza v. Filmore Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. JosephsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Brown v. St. Venantius SchoolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Abraham v. GuptaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Luchejko v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Grijalba v. FloroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Ellis v. Hilton United Methodist ChurchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- United Nat. Bank v. ParishNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Debra Gottsleben v. Christopher AnneseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.