Legal Opinion
Abraham v. Gupta
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 21, 1995PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
281 N.J. Super. 81 (1995)
656 A.2d 850
KOICKAL ABRAHAM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, AND SUSSAME ABRAHAM, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
VIJAY GUPTA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND CITY OF JERSEY CITY AND/OR POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 20, 1995.
Decided April 21, 1995.
Before Judges PETRELLA, HAVEY and BROCHIN.
Peter J. Vazquez argued the cause for appellant (Blume, Vazquez, Goldfaden, Berkowitz & Donnelly, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Vazquez on the letter-brief).
Gerald Kaplan argued the cause for respondent (Berlin, Kaplan, Dembling & Burke, P.A., attorneys…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stewart v. 104 Wallace Street, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Mirza v. Filmore Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Yanhko v. FaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Brown v. St. Venantius SchoolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Krug v. WannerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Luchejko v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Hollus v. Amtrak Northeast CorridorDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Mohamed v. IGLESIA EVANGELICANew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Smith v. YoungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Restivo v. Church of Saint Joseph of PalisadesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.