Legal Opinion

First-Mechanics National Bank of Trenton v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 8, 1939No. Docket No. 91248PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*879OPINION.

Tyson :

The only question presented for decision is whether under the facts in the record petitioners are entitled to deduct for estate tax purposes the claim of Daniel P. Forst in the amount of $26,957.06. There is no question but that the claim was allowed and paid by the executors of the estate and that such action of the executors was approved and authorized by the Orphans Court of Mercer County, New Jersey.

The petitioners rely upon the claim submitted to the Mercer County Orphans Court and the decree of that court approving its allowance as establishing their right to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Libby v. HaleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
  2. Sanitary District of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Marine Iron Works v. WiessCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1906
  4. Mitchell v. Kemp & Burpee Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
  5. Murmann v. WisslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First-Mechanics Nat. Bank v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. Baldwin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  3. Estate of Sochalski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
  4. First-Mechanics Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API