Legal Opinion

Mejia v. JMM Audubon, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 20, 2003PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Verdict awarding plaintiff certain amount for past pain and suffering, but nothing for future pain and suffering, was supported by testimony of defendants’ expert orthopedist to extent he opined that, while trauma plaintiff sustained in slip-and-fall accident may have temporarily stimulated pain in her knee, plaintiff had recovered from effects of trauma by time of trial, and her continuing pain in knee arose from underlying condition of degenerative arthritis that long predated accident.

*262Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden; J.), entered August 8, 2002, which, after a jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. People v. JusticeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McDermott v. Coffee Beanery, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Robles v. Polytemp, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Crooms v. Sauer Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Latour v. Hayner Hoyt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (Mtbe) ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API