State v. William L. Witt(074468)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1DissentJustice LaVECCHIA
Persistence has paid off.
This is not the first time that the State has sought to have the decision in State v. Pena-Flores, 198 N.J. 6, 965 A.2d 114 (2009), revisited and overturned. Pena-Flores reaffirmed State v. Cooke, 163 N.J. 657, 751 A.2d 92 (2000), which held that our state constitutional law requires that exigency remain part of the analysis when reviewing law enforcement’s purported justification for searching a car in New Jersey without a warrant authorized by a neutral magistrate. Both cases held that exigency is a necessary component for a warrantless search of a ear stopped…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.