Legal Opinion
People v. Lujan
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided February 18, 1983No. Crim. A. No. 1064; Crim. A. No. 1065; Crim. A. No. 1059PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZIEBARTH, J.
All of these appeals raise essentially the same issues and we have, therefore, consolidated them for purposes of this decision.
I
Facts
The facts in each of these consolidated appeals indicate that each of the appellants has suffered convictions of violations of the relatively new California drunk driving statute, Vehicle Code section 23152, subdivision (b) (hereafter 23152(b)). This statute, which became effective on January 1, 1982, reads as follows:
“(b) It is unlawful for any person who has 0.10 percent or more, by weight, of alcohol in his or her blood to drive a vehicle…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burg v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. SweetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Carter v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- State v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.