Legal Opinion

Gairson v. Gladden

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1967Published

1Opinion of the Court

247 Or. 88 (1967)

425 P.2d 761

WILLIAM OLEN GAIRSON, Appellant, v. GLADDEN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued January 3, 1967.

Affirmed March 29, 1967.

Motion to recall mandate and modify decision denied May 16, 1967.

Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.

David H. Blunt, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, Salem.

Before PERRY, Chief Justice, and McALLISTER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN,[*] Justices.

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State v. NeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. EndsleyOregon Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API