Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1993No. B070733PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TURNER, P. J.

I. Introduction

Petitioner, the City of Los Angeles, seeks a writ of mandate directing the respondent court to grant its motion for summary judgment. Because plaintiffs’ lawsuit and petition for relief from the claims requirement were not timely filed, the summary judgment motion should have been granted. Accordingly, the petition is granted.

II. Facts and Procedural History

Plaintiffs Mark and Janette Katz suffered damages to their real and personal property when a city sewer backed up and “flooded the entire house with human waste and other raw sewage.” Plaintiffs alleged…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Williams v. HorvathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gilberd v. AC TRANSITCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. D.C. v. Oakdale Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. City of San Diego v. Superior Court CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. (PC) Tapia v. DiazDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. Arianna Marino v. Aven Financial, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API