Legal Opinion

Dorsett v. City of Greencastle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1895No. 17,202PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellant sued the city for personal injuries sustained in falling from the lot of another into a street newly but properly graded to the depth of six *39feet below the surface of the lot. The alleged negligence of the city is in the failure of its contractor to put a barrier along the lot’s line or to maintain a light or other warning of danger. It is alleged, however, that a plank sidewalk, formerly maintained in the line of the street, had been placed upon its edge'on the lot, at the side of the street excavation, and at an -angle of forty-five degrees, slanting toward the street, and,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Noe v. RollIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Ketcham v. BarbourIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. HowlandIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Long v. ArcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Green v. EdenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. City of Huntington v. CastIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API