Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. George W. Craig v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 2, 1965No. 14960_1Published

1ConcurrenceKalodner, Chief Judge

(concurring) :

I join in the denial of the petition for rehearing solely on the ground that the petitioner-appellant failed to exhaust his available remedies in the state court.

In United States ex rel. Campbell v. Rundle, Supt. and Shoemaker, 327 F.2d 153 (1964) this Court said:

“ * * * the court below was without jurisdiction to entertain the suit because of the provisions of Section 2254, Title 28, U.S.C., which provide that a federal court shall not grant the writ of habeas corpus unless it appears that the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State, and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States ex rel. Dalton v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  3. United States of America Ex Rel. Noah Willis Altizer v. Edward J. Hendrick, Superintendent of Philadelphia County PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API