Legal Opinion
United States v. Rundle
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 27, 1964No. 14440PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
327 F.2d 153
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Charles C. CAMPBELL, Appellant,
v.
A. J. RUNDLE, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and
Daniel W. Shoemaker, District Attorney of York County, Pennsylvania.
No. 14440.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued September 24, 1963.
Decided January 27, 1964.
Martin Vinikoor, Philadelphia (Vinikoor, Fein, Criden and Johanson, Stanford Shmukler, Philadelphia, on the brief), for appellant.
Daniel W. Shoemaker, Dist. Atty., York (Earl R. Doll, Asst. Dist. Atty., York, on the brief), for appellees.
Before BIGGS,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. George W. Craig v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Ex Rel. George W. Craig v. James F. Maroney, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965