Legal Opinion
Strizheus v. Kooistra
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 27, 2023No. 4:23-cv-04028Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION VITALIY STRIZHEUS, NATALIYA 4:23-CV-04028-RAL STRIZHEUS, Plaintiffs, OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY VS. INJUNCTION THE CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA, Defendant. Plaintiffs Vitaliy and Nataliya Strizheus (collectively “Plaintiffs”) seek a preliminary injunction to prevent Defendant the City of Sioux Falls (“the City”) from enforcing a final state court judgment permitting the razing of Plaintiffs’ partially constructed mansion because of past violations of the City’s code. Razing of the home would be…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.