Legal Opinion

Tonningsen v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1932No. 6603PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

December 31, 1923, petitioners, husband and wife, executed a 99-year lease of property owned by them in the city and county of San Francisco and gave to their lessees an option to purchase the demised property within a certain time. January 3, 1924, petitioners paid to the real estate brokers who negotiated the lease the sum of $21,333 as a commission, consisting of $10,000 cash and the right to remove from the demised premises a building of the then market value of $11,333. In their j.oint income tax return for the calendar year 1924, filed on the cash receipts and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burnet v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. McIlhenny v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
  3. Young v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
  4. Porter v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cotnam v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  2. Gaylord v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Marvin Sherwin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. Home Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Renwick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API