Hidalgo County Water Improvement Dist. No. Two v. Cameron County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. Five
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Per curiam
Relators have asked for writs of prohibition and injunction against O. E. Van Berg as Master in Chancery (sometimes called River Master), certain other persons and certain Water Control and Improvement Districts, and against the Judge of the 107th District Court, during the pen-dency of an appeal from an order of that court. The essence of their position is that the trial court’s interlocutory order was essentially the appointment of a receiver or a trustee. An interlocutory order appointing a receiver may be superseded upon an appeal. Shell Petroleum Corporation v. Grays, 122 Tex. 491, 62…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Herring v. Houston National Exchange BankTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- Watkins Land Co. v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Adjudication of the Water Rights, Etc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement District No. EighteenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Hidalgo County Water Improvement Dist. No. 2 v. Cameron County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 5Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Maverick County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. City of LaredoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Ben Martinez v. Maverick County Water Control And Improvement District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.