In Re Tant
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtors object to the proof of claim of Helen Tant’s former husband, Joseph Francis, and Mr. Francis objects to the confirmation of debtors Chapter 13 plan for its failure to address his claim. This is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(B) and (L) over which the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(b), 157(a), and 157(b)(1). For the reasons set forth below, I find that debtors’ objection to the claim of creditor, Joseph Francis, is overruled and, therefore, confirmation of the debtors’ Chapter 13 plan is denied…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- William Wayne Picco v. Global Marine Drilling Company, and Crosbie Offshore Services, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Richard Gonzales, Juliana Gonzales and Michael Dodge v. Barbara Parks and Jerome ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Thomas F. Lovell v. James G. Mixon, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Lane v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,953 in the Matter Of: Arthur R. Matthews, Jr., Debtor-Appellant v. Martin J. Rosene and John K. KneafseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carpio v. Smith (In Re Carpio)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
- In Re AdamsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997