Legal Opinion
Carmichaels Arbors Associates v. United States Ex Rel. Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 14, 1992No. Civ. A. 89-2252PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MENCER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carmichaels Arbors entered into a Housing Assistance Payment contract (“HAP contract”) with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development to construct an apartment complex in Greene County, Pennsylvania, for low-income elderly and handicapped persons. HUD was authorized to enter into HAP contracts under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 1437f.
The Section 8 program was designed to provide housing for low-income persons through the use of private sector developers or through…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- One & Ken Valley Housing Group v. Maine State Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Rohrbach v. AT & T Nassau Metals Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Wicker v. VogelNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- Doe v. Methacton School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.